[Mb-civic] Bodies for Barrels: Betrayal and Energy Dependence

[Michael Butler]

        Editor's Note: This perspective comes from an Ohio Republican.
Michael A. Fox served as a member of the Ohio House of Representatives for
23 years and is currently a County Commissioner in Butler County, Ohio.
Conservative on most issues, Fox has come to realize that the war in Iraq is
about feeding our oil addiction and it doesn't sit well with him. He raises
his voice eloquently against "trading the bodies of our young people for
barrels of oil." As more and more Americans from both the right and the left
discover that the current energy crisis is not temporary but permanent, the
political ground underneath many different issues, from the environment to
foreign policy, will shift.
        --kw/TO

        Bodies for Barrels: Betrayal and Energy Dependence
        By Michael A. Fox
        t r u t h o u t | Perspective

        America's energy problems are not, as President Bush recently
declared, because Americans have an "addiction to oil." Our energy problems
stem from the failed leadership of two political parties - Democrats and
Republicans.

        For over thirty years presidents and congresses from both parties
have had an addiction to playing politics and courting the special interests
who fund their next election cycle - all at the expense of our national
security.

        They have betrayed us. America felt the first shock wave of energy
dependence with the oil embargo of 1973. The lessons from that experience
were clear - our nation and our economy could be brought to its knees by a
handful of hate-filled lunatics in the Middle East; a lesson ignored by both
parties. Since then, leaders from each party periodically paid lip service
to energy independence, making symbolic moves designed to reassure the
public that making America energy independent was important. But neither
party ever made it a priority. Neither party has provided continuous and
determined leadership to secure our national security by securing our energy
independence.

        The result? Never in our history has our country been more
vulnerable to foreign influence and economic attack from our enemies. The
neglect and betrayal by both parties has led us to an unspoken yet
horrifically real and hollow energy and foreign policy that reduces us to
trading the bodies of our young people for barrels of oil.

        Like many Americans I trusted the President. I believe that he is a
good and decent man. But like presidents before him, he cannot even seem to
envision a policy that leads to energy independence. When he delivered his
State of the Union Address a few weeks ago, I cringed when I heard him brag
that "Since 2001, we have spent nearly $10 billion to develop cleaner,
cheaper, and more reliable alternative energy sources - and we are on the
threshold of incredible advances." He announced the creation of an "Advanced
Energy Initiative - a 22 percent increase in clean energy research." Big
deal, like going to a gun fight with a toy knife.

        Suggesting that we can somehow do anything meaningful to achieve
energy independence by increasing our five year investment in research by
roughly $200 million per year is laughable. To put this investment in energy
independence in perspective, consider that since 2001 Americans have spent
$200 billion dollars on pet food - 20 times more on buying pet food than the
federal government spends on energy research.

        Here's the essence of our energy policy. Imagine this: you pull into
a gas station and tell the attendant to fill up the gas tank. It comes time
to pay and the attendant asks "Which of your children do you want to
sacrifice in payment." Which child must die? Ridiculous? How is that
different than what we are doing in the Middle East?

        The invasion of Iraq, the stationing of our 6th Fleet in the
Mediterranean, the posting of our troops at a cost of hundreds of billions
of dollars annually throughout the Middle East is about protecting the oil
fields of Saudi Arabia - our so-called ally who has provided funding for
most of the terrorist groups that stir anti-American hatred throughout the
world.

        America invests hundreds of billions of dollars and thousands of
young people's lives and mangled bodies each year to make sure each of us
can fill up our tank when we need it - bodies for barrels. But what if we
had to trade our child (as so many have been called to do) for a full tank
of gas?

        Wouldn't we demand an alternative solution like a responsible energy
policy that is as important to us as the Manhattan Project was during World
War II or putting a man on the moon was in the 60s? I believe we would - and
we should.

        If it is financially sustainable for our nation to spend what some
estimate will be a trillion dollars in the Iraqi War before we're finished,
then why is it so outlandish to expect that we make an equal investment of
national and financial resources to energy independence? If we are willing
to ask our young people to sacrifice and die or get maimed so we can top off
our tanks, then why are we not equally willing to commit our nation to
energy independence?

        Our nation's energy vulnerability is an outrageous betrayal by both
parties - Democrats and Republicans. In the coming days you will see a
frenzy of proposals coming from both Democrats and Republicans in the
Congress. These proposals will continue to cascade until the November
election and then we'll go back to business as usual.

        These gestures are nothing more than symbolic gestures. The public
needs more than symbols from our leaders; we deserve solutions. America has
the ingenuity, intellectual infrastructure, spirit and knowledge to come
through this crisis as we have others in our history.

        Across America there are young minds teeming with ideas that deserve
research funding so they can help us end our reliance on foreign energy.
There are ideas that will enable us to conserve more energy, get more
efficiency out of our engines and industrial enterprises and lead to
alternative sources heretofore not even considered.

        The missing ingredients are and always have been, leadership,
vision, and will. Money follows vision. Our political leaders need to
articulate a simple vision and actually mean it - energy independence.

        Here's a start. As Congress currently debates a measure that will
provide increased funding for the Iraq War why not adopt a policy that says:
"Not one more dollar should be spent on the Iraq War or securing the oil
fields and shipping lanes of the world unless an equal dollar is spent on
research to secure our energy independence?" If it is important enough to
spend a dollar sending a young man or woman to war then it is important
enough as a nation to spend an equal dollar eliminating the threat that
causes them to lay down their life.

        America needs political leadership that looks beyond the next
election and beyond the favor of oil and multinational corporate interests.
There is nothing that America cannot achieve if we commit ourselves to a
vision and support it with the full will and might of our nation. What
happened to the days when our political leaders had the courage to do what
is right and had the will to set politics aside to protect our national
security?

        There is nothing more important to America's future than securing
energy independence. Without it, our children and grandchildren are likely
to see wars of incomprehensible destruction. President Eisenhower once said
that "the only way to win World War III was to prevent it."

        We are at the threshold or Armageddon and the fuse that is likely to
set it off is energy dependency, nations warring to secure scarce resources.
Our ability to avoid the incomprehensible horror of World War III depends on
our energy independence. Continued energy dependence will mean continued
war. America can do better than an energy policy that trades the bodies of
our young people for barrels of oil. In order to do this, each American has
to stand ready to make whatever sacrifice is required to become energy
independent.

        Why not give research a chance? Why not give America's brilliance
and innovative spirit a chance? Why not enlist the creativity and
intellectual fire-power of our young people's minds and back it with the
full might of our nation's wealth?

        If we must, in the short run, spend billions of dollars to send our
young people into battle to secure the oil our economy needs then let's
match those expenditures with equal amounts going into laboratories and
university research centers to find the solutions to our energy dependence.

        How can our leaders send someone's child to battle knowing that the
circumstances that make their sacrifice necessary are driven by the
unwillingness of our nation to make the sacrifices that must be made to
avoid the war we send them to fight? How can any congressman, senator, or
president send someone's child to battle without being able to look them in
the eye and tell them with conviction and truth that we will match their
sacrifice with the courage, force of will, and resources to become energy
independent?

        Our leaders are the stewards of freedom and thus far they have
betrayed the trust of the American people. On the day President John F.
Kennedy was murdered in Dallas, the speech he was to have delivered
contained these words: "We in this country - are - by destiny rather than by
choice - the watchmen on the walls of world freedom." His words ring true
today, and unless our national leaders break the bonds of energy dependence,
the walls of freedom will come tumbling down.

        Our leaders have been asleep at their posts. It's time that they
wake up and rise to the challenge of our time. It's time for them to make
some tough choices and break our chain of dependence. It is time for them to
muster the courage to do whatever is necessary to make sure that not one
American son our daughter is sent to battle to fight for a barrel of oil.

        For me the choice is easy. What I don't understand is why our
national leaders cannot see it. For the sake of our children, our future,
and the security of America, it's time we force them to see the challenge
and act.

      -------

      Jump to today's TO Features:

    (In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. t
r u t h o u t has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this
article nor is t r u t h o u t endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

    "Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and
allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are
often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on TO may
not match the versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to Original"
links.

      Print This Story  E-mail This Story

    

      
      

| t r u t h o u t | town meeting | issues | environment | labor | women |
health | voter rights | multimedia | donate | contact | subscribe |